Your editor deleted your videos

The first hour

Do these in order. The first one stops the bleeding; the rest are about evidence and scope, and both get harder the longer you wait.

1. Remove their access. In YouTube Studio, open Settings → Permissions, find the person, click the arrow under “Role” and choose Remove access — or drop them to a lower role if you need them to keep working. That screen also names everyone who currently has access, which is the fastest way to see who could have done this.
2. Change the password and sign out other sessions on the Google account that owns the channel, and confirm two-step verification is on. Removing a collaborator does nothing if the other party still has the owner credentials.
3. Write down what is missing — titles, approximate upload dates, and any video IDs you can recover from your own analytics exports, emails, or links you have posted elsewhere. You will need this list for support and for re-uploading, and your memory of it will get worse within a day.
4. Do not re-upload anything yet. Re-uploading changes video IDs and muddles what was lost versus what you replaced, which makes the next step harder to explain to anyone.

What you can actually get back

From YouTube, nothing. Google's documentation on deleting a video does not hedge: “When you delete a video, it's permanently deleted. If you'd like to watch the video in the future, make sure you have a backup saved.” There is no trash, no undo, and no restore path in Studio. Your recovery is your own master files — the project, the export, the backup drive.

Contacting support is still worth doing if the deletions look like account compromise rather than a collaborator's decision, because that is a different problem and they can help with the account. But do not wait on it to start rebuilding.

What you lose with the video is not only the file. View counts, the comment history, and the URL every external link pointed at go with it. A re-upload is a new video with a new ID and an empty comment section — which is why this particular mistake stings long after the footage is back.

Why YouTube let them — the part that surprises people

Start with the fact most people in this situation have not been told: the Editor role cannot delete a published video. YouTube's own permissions documentation lists an Editor as able to edit everything, upload and publish, and delete drafts — while explicitly not able to “delete channel or published content”. A Manager can: that role can “create, upload, publish, and delete content”. Only the owner can delete the channel itself. The full role table sets all seven side by side.

So if published videos are gone, the account that did it almost certainly held Manager access, not Editor — or it was the owner account itself, which raises the separate question of whether it was compromised. That distinction is worth establishing before you decide what happened, and it is the first thing to check on the Permissions screen while you are there.

Two things follow. The first: if you grant access again, Editor is meaningfully safer than Manager, and a great many creators hand out Manager without noticing the difference. The second is the part that catches people who go looking for a tool instead: at the API layer there is no such separation. To change a video's title, description or tags through YouTube's Data API — the interface every third-party tool must use — an application holds one of youtube, youtube.force-ssl or youtubepartner, and all three also authorise deleting videos. Google's description of the narrowest one is blunt:

“See, edit, and permanently delete your YouTube videos, ratings, comments and captions.”

Which is why the protection cannot come from picking a cleverer permission for a tool. It has to come from the workflow: who holds the access, and what has to happen before anything reaches the live channel.

What actually prevents a repeat

The only durable fix is that your editor never holds channel access at all. Not a narrower role — no access. They need somewhere to do the work and a way to hand it to you; they do not need the ability to reach your live channel, and every arrangement that gives them one is a bet on their judgement and their account security.

That is what VidGate is. Your editor signs in with an email link — no Google account, no YouTube permission of any kind — and drafts titles, descriptions, tags and thumbnails, or uploads a cut for you to watch. You see every proposed change as a diff against what is live right now, and nothing reaches YouTube until you approve it. The channel grant stays on your account, VidGate never calls YouTube's delete endpoint, and every push is recorded so it can be rolled back.

Before you hire the next editor

• — Never share the owner login. Ever. It removes your ability to attribute anything.
• — Keep your own masters. Assume the copy on YouTube is a publication, not a backup.
• — Give access to people, not to roles you forget about. Review who can reach the channel on a schedule you actually keep.
• — Prefer a workflow where the editor never needs access in the first place, so that offboarding an editor is not a security event.

Questions people ask next